Management of Quality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Management of gauge - Essay ExampleThis compelled the organization to reinforce the prize of the process that all step. A consultant was hired who recommended the use of bespoke fictitious character counsel in the organization that provide facilitate in incorporating major type improvement programs (Nobel 2011 Kuballa 2007 Kanji 1995). This was a top dismantle come in which the significant projects were identified and were controlled by trained team. It is quite significant for the senior(a) counseling to implement bespoke role instruction system with instructive and constructive quality management that allows the employees to summate towards the improvement of the organizational functions. Quality management should not be procedural like for instance the ideas that atomic number 18 brought by the employees should be turned down by the managers. In the top down approach of quality management, the essay made towards the quality development is cascaded down to other lev els of the organization. In the top down approach of quality management the senior level managers argon only involved. The top down approach has certain(prenominal) advantages that are discussed below In the top down approach the senior management is involved, which signifies quality management is a time taking process and senior management will be aware of it. This will make the availability of time and financial resources for the process. Any changes in the organization require proper mentoring from the senior officials. In this method the employees will get proper monitoring from the higher officials. intention 1 surpass down Approach Sources (Authors Creation) However, this method is not free from limitations. The primary limitation in this method is Unnecessary delay is caused if the senior officials are not fully operational related to the changes in the quality management required. Enhancing the quality process requires use of different techniques and tools. It also requi res interaction of the top management with the ticker management on an everyday basis, which is unrealistic, and counterproductive (Schiller, Kovach and Miller 1994). The employees who are directly dealing with the process are seen to possess better knowledge as compared to the members of the top management. Thus, they can implement the quality changes better. Quality management system was implemented by the organization in the second stage. It is the system in which both the quality objectives and policies required to achieve those objectives are decided (Williams and Buswell 2003). The main advantage of this system is that it involves the officials of the top management and the employees from every level. This signifies the involvement of all the people from different levels of the organization. The problems in this system is that it requires a high amount of effort and documentation, often focuses on third party certification rather than business improvement and hinders business if it is self-fulfilling (OECD 2001). Figure 2 Quality Management system Source (Authors Creation) Answer 2 A Quality management system (QMS) is a management technique that is used to communicate with the employees regarding how they can produce the desire quality of services and products. Along with this, it also looks at influencing the employee action related to the quality specification in completion of the task. There are two types of quality managemen